Trump demands Supreme Court to allow firing of regulators appointed only by teenage girls

President Donald Trump filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court on Wednesday in an attempt to overturn a lower court ruling that prevented the administration from firing three Biden-appointed regulators.

The emergency appeal requires the Superior Court to allow the Trump administration to fire three members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), an independent five-member regulatory committee that sets standards and oversees the safety of thousands of consumer products. The appeal came in May that the Supreme Court approved another Trump administration request for emergency appeal related to the firing of two competitive committee agencies officials from the National Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (NLRB) and Performance Systems Protection Commission (MSPB).

“We must seek Supreme Court intervention again, which is outrageous because the rogue left judge continues to violate the clear High Court ruling,” White House spokesman Harrison Fields said.

The Supreme Court allows for current termination of independent bodies board members

“The Supreme Court decisively upheld the president's constitutional powers to expel and dismiss his powers, but this continued attack by radical judges undermined the victory,” he continued. “Despite these relentless obstacles, President Trump is committed to achieving the mission of the American people by effectively leading the executive branch.”

Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. were appointed as a seven-year term for independent government agencies by former President Joe Biden. Historically, their positions have been protected from retribution, as they can only be terminated for neglect or malfeasance.

After Trump attempted to fire three Democratic regulators, they sued, arguing that the president tried to remove them without justifiable reasons. Ultimately, a federal judge in Maryland agreed with them, and the appeals court upheld the ruling this week.

But, according to an emergency appeal from the Trump administration, the High Court was filed on Wednesday morning, with three regulators concerned showing “hostility to the president’s agenda” and taking “actions that put the agency in chaos.”

Obama-appointed judge removes Trump order to prevent asylum claims and protects illegal immigrants

Official portrait pose of the U.S. Supreme Court Justice in the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC on October 7, 2022. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court ruled favoring the Trump administration’s decision to fire two executive labor relations officials, with the Supreme Court’s urgent appeal adding that it was “impossible.”

“After Wilcox, none of this should be the possibility of direct control of such a situation. For example, the CPSC exercised “a considerable power of enforcement” in Wilcox, CPSC exercised “a considerable power of enforcement,” 145 S. Ct., for example, by issuing rules, issuing rules, ruling administrative litigation, issuing persons in charge, and placed in execution litigation (and in case of enforcement personnel), and raised obligations, and proposed unprecedented proposals, proposed unprecedented measures, and proposed unprecedented measures, and proposed unprecedented measures. In criminal cases, the judiciary John Sauer wrote in an urgent appeal to the Supreme Court.

President Donald Trump shook hands with Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts R. Melania Trump, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump were sworn in after being sworn in at the circular ceremony at the Washington State Building on January 20, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Reuters)

Click here to get the Fox News app

According to Politico, the request will address Chief Justice John Roberts, who is responsible for the emergency appeal, originated from the Court of Appeal, which upheld the last Maryland court's ruling that blocked the Trump administration's shooting.