Cruz and Klobuchar confronted at key hearings in federal judge's order

Senators Ted Cruz and D-Minn of R-Texas. Sen. Amy Klobuchar hit on a federal judge's hearing on the Trump administration's national order, with Democrats dismissing her colleague's claims about “labor”.
“Understanding this is the second phase of the law,” Cruz said in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
“Now, they're working to sue President Trump and stop voters from re-selecting him, and they'll move forward and seek a personal radical judge,” said Republicans in Texas.
Republican defectors help Senate resolve early to cancel Trump tariffs despite White House veto warning
Cruz asked why these cases were not filed in the red zone. (AP)
Klobuchar objected to this, telling Cruz that the federal judge's injunction was the result of President Donald Trump's “unconstitutional” policy.
Minnesota Democrats started before being interrupted by Cruz: “Why should a Trump-appointed judge…”
Senate Dems heralds more forced votes to stop Trump's emergency orders

Klobuchar accused Cruz of lying. (Nathan Howard/Bloomberg by Getty Image)
“Why don't you submit the red area?” Cruz asked. “Why is the Democratic Attorney General looking for the left, blue swing zone?”
Klobuchar claims that the surge in the nationwide ban on district judges who stopped Trump administration’s actions is not because “these judges are curved, mad or evil.” She warned that making such claims could cause threats and violence against them.
Scoop: Lindsey Graham amendment signal Republican budget breakthrough, setting phases for Trump's agenda

Donald Trump, Judge James Boasberg, Amir Ali and Ana Reyes (Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg by Getty Images; U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia; Senator Durbin by YouTube; Bill Pugliano by Getty Images)
Cruz criticized Democrats for inadequate threats to conservative Supreme Court justices in recent years. But Klobuchar lied and said: “We got together and got more money for the judges and changed things so they could get more protection.”
Although several Democrats criticized “judge shopping” at the hearing, they were cautious not to fall behind the Republican bill to end all national bans.
Dick Durbin, a member of the D-ill rank, said: “It is impossible to distinguish the hearing from the record of President Trump's tenure.”
Trump, Senate Republican budget leader huddles in White House in settlement bill

Durbin claimed the ban was evidence of Trump's unconstitutional behavior. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
But, as the Democrats have proposed in the past, ultimate judge shopping does not completely solve the problem, with most witness John N., who was previously acting deputy attorney general for the Department of Justice (DOJ), chairman of the Department of Justice Supervision Reform Task Force, deputy director of the Justice Department, deputy director of the Justice Department, and consumer fraud.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Panuccio Panuccio: “I think the motivation for forum shopping is that you think you can find a judge who can be the ruler of the entire country.