Trump 'liked' the House bill to prevent judges from banning Trump from taking policy in the U.S.

First on Fox: President Trump has shown interest in a House Republican bill that would prevent federal judges from issuing bans nationwide.

Sources said White House aides communicated to senior Capitol Hill staff this week that the president wanted this. They said the White House felt time was essential in this matter and Trump wanted Congress to act quickly.

This comes after more than a dozen orders issued by judges from various U.S. district courts to prevent Trump from executing orders at least temporarily.

Rep. Darrell Issa's bill, if passed through Congress and signed into law, would in most cases prohibit such judges from blocking Trump policy nationwide.

Fox News Digital contacted Issa's office for confirmation, but was not heard at the time of publication.

A White House official told Fox News that they would not lead the president in legislative affairs.

But the idea seems to have gained appeal in the upper level of the White House. Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller complained to X on Thursday that the judge had the ability to influence the country's policies, although he did not specifically mention Issa's bill.

“The issuance of a ruling that affects the entire country requires five Supreme Court judges. However, the lonely district court judges assume the power to unilaterally decide the policies of the entire administration of the government,” Miller said.

He later republished: “A Marxist judge in San Francisco has the same executive power as the commander-in-chief of the national election to lead the executive branch? There is no such theory. It's just bare judicial tyranny.”

ISSA's legislation reads: “No U.S. District Court has issued any order that provides for injunctive relief, unless applicable to the order, only for litigation in the case, i.e., a party seeking injunctive in respect of the district court in that district court.”

The bill was introduced earlier this month through the House Judiciary Committee. “We think it's good. We'll pass it through the committee. We'll try to pass it on the floor of the House and go through the whole process,” R-Ohio chairman Jim Jordan told CNN on Wednesday.

Rep. Darrell Issa introduced the bill last month (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Jordan told Fox News figures last month that he thought Issa's bill “makes meaningful” and that the committee will “try to act fairly quickly on the bill.”

Fox News Digital contacted the House Judiciary Committee to comment on Trump's support for the ISSA bill, but did not return at press time.

But this is some disagreement among Congressional Republicans about how to view Trump’s call for dealing with “activist” judges.

R-Texas Rep. Brandon Gill recently proposed a resolution to impeach U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg after he ordered Trump to plan to deport suspicious Tren de Aragua Gang members to a 14-day emergency stop for El Salvador.

Jill argued that Boasberg abused his powers and told Fox News this week that he hoped the resolution would pass the regular committee process – something Jordan seemed willing.

Jordan told multiple media that he could hold a hearing on Jill's resolution, a traditional step in the improvisation process.

Trump posted about him earlier this week on “Social Truth” and he also hopes that Boasberg will improvise each.

But, multiple sources told Fox News numbers that House Republican leaders are more alert to the improper line because virtual guarantees such a move won't allow necessary Democrats to pass the Senate.

“It's another intense whipping process that doesn't move at all in the Senate,” said a senior Republican aide. “I think the White House is trying to find something easier.”

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller believes district judges should not impose bans nationwide (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

Speaker Mike Johnson's office told Fox News Digital that he was looking for all available options when commenting on the way forward of House Republicans Thursday morning.

A Johnson spokesman said: “Radical judges with political agendas pose a major threat to the rule of law, equality justice and separation of power. The spokesman looks forward to working with the Judiciary Committee as they review all available options under constitutional conditions to address this urgent matter.”

Fox News Digital also contacted the Senate Judiciary Committee to implement the legislation.

Andrew Mark Miller of Fox News Digital contributes to this report