The Last Mile of Nursing: Why Value-Based Success Starts at the Bedside

If your value-based care strategy doesn’t reach the bedside, can it really be called care?

We have seen growing investment in population health platforms, analytical dashboards and retrospective reporting tools. But often these efforts don’t affect what really matters – what happens right now in the care moment. I call the final link between strategy and execution (between making real-time care decisions and outcome formation) the last mile. In a value-based voting model, this is the point where the final decision is successful or failure.

Analysis No action

Many solutions are now for summary and analysis rather than intervention. Practice teams and ACOs are dashboards often filled with outdated retrospective data, but their frontline clinicians fish in the dark. They may know which patients are theoretically at high risk – but most importantly, they have potential opportunities to intervene and change the process of adverse outcomes.

Typically, is the clinician-to-bed 14 a part of ACO, I-SNP or traditional health insurance. Each of these programs has its own model of care, documentation and coding requirements, clinical pathways and quality indicators. Without the visibility of the bedside, precise care becomes a guess. If we cannot support the nursing team at delivery, we will no longer pay results or reimbursement.

The last mile looks

I spent a lot of time with acute and long-term care physicians and pre-practice clinicians in the field, and their daily routine was very stressful: seeing over 20 patients in multiple skilled care facilities, usually limited support staff, and constantly coordinating with the super stretched care team. The work is ruthless – the bet is high. Every decision, every document, every missed warning sign has consequences in downstream consequences.

At the bedside, practitioners not only provide care. They are reconciling medications, identifying signs of decline, aligning with facility care programs, and capturing clinical documentation to facilitate models such as PDPM, ACOS and Medicare Advantage programs (e.g. I-SNP). Often, they are doing all of these things without a clear view of the patient’s complete clinical environment or risk model. No wonder so much value is left on the table.

Here, technology has to do more than just provide reports. It must take action. Practitioners need to make the right time and place to make treatment decisions at the right time and place. That's not analysis. That's support.

Why integration is not negotiable

Without a shared workflow, nursing collaboration won’t work properly. That's not enough to read the data – your entire interdisciplinary team must be able to take action. If your system does not allow entry of orders, synchronize diagnosis, or uninstalling work from the care team, then you won't enable care, you're just logging the comments.

The real integration means:

• Timely attribution: Get an immediate understanding of the program or payer model that the member has registered, or the patient attributes it to
• Unified patient environment: diagnosis, medication, behavioral alerts, changes in conditions, and more – all in one place
• Two-way collaboration: Orders and updates flow seamlessly between practice groups and skilled nursing and advanced living facilities

Groups with disconnected tools or scanned PDFs are increasingly viewed as their partnership lagging behind. The facility requires partners who can plug in the workflow and deliver results. They need more – they deserve better.

Successful look

Some organizations have shown success when the infrastructure enables holistic care delivery. When groups can benchmark key metrics such as avoidable hospitalization, ED transfer, document integrity, and facility-level performance, and use this data to guide interventions – they can demonstrate true ROI.

In my own conversation with SNF leaders, I heard this time and again: “We switch to whether they can provide us with significant improvements in clinical outcomes and share the same information on the highway, which is essential to alleviate the burden on constrained caregivers.” That’s what the industry requires – no more than the dashboard, but a bedside-aware data-driven system that improves care and performance.

What should leaders ask

If you are a practice group or facility leader in evaluating value-based care strategies, start with the following questions:

• Can your clinician view patient attribution and risk information at this moment?
• Are diagnostics and documentation synchronized between facilities and adventure entities?
• Can your workflow be intervened in time at the bedside?
• Can you benchmark performance through metrics such as hospitalization, ER utilization, and risk adjustment?

If the answer is no, then you won't solve the value – you drive while looking in the rear view.

Everything falls by the bed

The last mile of care is not where the work ends, but where the value begins. State-of-the-art analyses do not matter if they cannot be activated by the people who are caring for.

If we want to succeed in value-based care, we must move from a system of distant observation to frontline clinicians for the tools and support equipment needed. That is where real, informed, holistic care is achieved, and the future of healthcare will be realized.

Photos: SDI production, Getty images

This article passed Mixed Influencer program. Anyone can post a view on MedCity News' healthcare business and innovation through MedCity Remacence. Click here to learn how.